Tallon Griekspoor vs Jan-Lennard Struff Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Insights for the upcoming tennis match:

Analysing the predictions for the forthcoming tennis match, various factors can be taken into account to determine the potential outcome. These include the recent form of the players, statistical correlations, performance under pressure, player levels, head-to-head matches, and opponent quality.

Recent form and second serve performance:

Over the past six months, it has been observed that Struff has exhibited a second serve performance of 47.09% points won while Griekspoor has demonstrated a slightly better performance with 49.72% points won. This statistic holds a noteworthy correlation with the accuracy of match predictions.

Recent form and return game stats:

Taking into account recent form, Struff has won 52.88% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Griekspoor achieved a winning percentage of 44.32%. In terms of first serve returns, the stats stand at 25% and 23.77% for Struff and Griekspoor, respectively. These statistics have a profound association with determining the favored player in their head-to-head encounter.

Performance under pressure analysis:

When it comes to saving breakpoints under pressure, Struff has the ability to save 57.26% of breakpoints, compared to Griekspoor's 68.18%. This statistical insight proves to be quite useful for in-game betting predictions.

Performance overview:

In the past year, Struff has secured victory in 58% of the matches they played (29 wins and 21 losses), while Griekspoor has a 50% win rate (29 wins and 29 losses). This provides an overall picture of their head-to-head prediction for this upcoming match.

Best surface performance:

Struff's winning percentage on clay, their best career surface, stands at 62% (272 wins and 168 losses). However, on grass, their performance drops slightly with a winning percentage of 45% (28 wins and 34 losses). On the other hand, Griekspoor excels on grass with a 65% winning rate (22 wins and 12 losses), but struggles on indoor hard courts, with a winning percentage of 55% (69 wins and 56 losses).

Player level:

Examining the player levels over the past year, Struff primarily participated in matches on the main tour, achieving a 62.5% win rate (15 wins and 9 losses). Conversely, Griekspoor also predominantly played on the main tour, recording a 54.17% win rate (13 wins and 11 losses). Hence, it is crucial to compare the statistics between players considering the event levels they have been competing at in order to predict the favorite.

Direct head-to-head matches:

In their previous encounters, Struff and Griekspoor have faced each other twice, resulting in Struff being unsuccessful in obtaining victory, while Griekspoor has emerged triumphant both times. In total, they have contested eight sets, with Struff winning three and Griekspoor winning five. Their most recent match took place at the Davis Cup, World Group, SF, GER-NED on November 22, 2024, where Griekspoor secured a triumph with a scoreline of 6-7(4) 7-5 6-4.

Head-to-head match duration:

Historically, the average match duration between these players in head-to-head encounters has been 2 hours, 49 minutes, and 30 seconds.

Deciding set predictions:

When it comes to playing deciding sets, Struff and Griekspoor have encountered this scenario twice before. Regrettably, Struff failed to secure a win on both occasions, while Griekspoor emerged victorious twice. This insight provides valuable information for predicting the outcome if the match goes the distance.

Head-to-head in extreme pressure situations:

In their past battles, Struff and Griekspoor have contested two tiebreaks, resulting in one win for Struff and one win for Griekspoor.

Opponent quality statistics:

Over the last twelve months, Struff has competed against opponents with an average rank of 79.12, while Griekspoor has faced players with an average rank of 72.91.

Deciding set performance versus all players:

Considering the statistics of deciding sets, Struff has emerged victorious in 41% of matches played within the last year, while Griekspoor has a higher success rate of 48% in all matches played on the tour. These figures offer valuable insights for in-game live betting predictions, particularly if the match extends to a deciding set.

Current event head-to-head stats:

While past player performances are significant indicators for predicting tennis matches, it is crucial to also examine the current event stats to gain an understanding of the in-form players. For this purpose, please refer to the section below (if the players have competed in the current event). Additionally, certain players tend to perform better at specific events, thus necessitating the consideration of such factors when making predictions.

Break point conversion:

In recent form, Struff has successfully converted 30.84% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Griekspoor has excelled with a conversion rate of 38.28% in breaking their opponent's serve. This statistic is particularly telling for in-game live betting tips whenever either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

If you have an interest in models that predict tennis matches, the following article serves as an excellent starting point (Warning: Stats geeks only).